MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175876344

Improved Adaptive Genetic Algorithm in Optimal Layout of Leather Rectangular Parts

2015· article· en· W2175876344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossoverRectangleGenetic algorithmMass customizationAlgorithmMathematical optimizationConvergence (economics)Key (lock)EngineeringComputer sciencePersonalizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mass customization of Leather products (such as sofa), the intelligent layout is the key technology to improve material utilization. The paper faces artificial leather fabric cutting problem, most can be converted into a rectangle packing layout problem. This paper proposes a new improved adaptive genetic algorithm. Crossover and mutation probability of genetic algorithm adaptively adjust on the basis of logistic curve equation and the shortcomings of traditional adaptive genetic algorithm solved well. The remaining rectangle algorithm as the decoding algorithm and adopting New cross-ways, the niche technology controlled whether the child individual replacement the parent individual or not accelerating convergence rate. Examples show that the algorithm of leather fabrics nesting is effective and a substantial increase in the utilization of leather fabric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it