MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175886995 · doi:10.3233/jae-2003-256

Mathematical foundations of the TC-method for computing multiple DC-operating points

2003· article· en· W2175886995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistive touchscreenComputationNonlinear systemOperating pointContinuationComputer sciencePoint (geometry)Line (geometry)SpiceSet (abstract data type)Network analysisTransfer (computing)Topology (electrical circuits)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a detailed mathematical analysis of nonlinear resistive networks with multiple dc-operating points. In our approach, we use elementary set theoretical principles of network theory. We propose two new approaches: the TC-method (transfer-characteristic method) and the DPC-method (driving-point characteristic method). We use the TC-method to reduce the computation of dc-operating points of a given nonlinear resistive network to the computation of crossing points between transfer characteristics of associated modified resistive networks with a straight line. It can be proved that at least one operating point of the given network corresponds to each such crossing point. We show that the proposed approaches lead to continuation methods for the finding dc-operating points of resistive networks. These continuation methods can be readily used in standard SPICE-like circuit simulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it