MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175901375 · doi:10.1149/1.3205647

Three-phase Boundary Length Evaluation in Modeled Sintered Composite Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electrodes

2009· article· en· W2175901375 on OpenAlexafffund
Craig Metcalfe, Olivera Kesler, Tony Rivard, F. Gitzhofer, Nicolas Abatzoglou

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrodeTriple phase boundaryMaterials scienceComposite numberSolid oxide fuel cellPhase (matter)Boundary (topology)Range (aeronautics)PorosityComposite materialPercolation (cognitive psychology)MathematicsMathematical analysisChemistryElectrolyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical methodology for evaluating the three-phase boundary length in sintered composite electrode layers is developed. Three dimensional models of sintered composite electrodes are generated for which the mean particle diameter, composition, and total porosity may be specified as input parameters. Tomographic methods are used to reconstruct the modeled electrode and the percolation for each phase is evaluated. The connected three-phase boundary length is calculated for a range of electrode designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207