MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175967895 · doi:10.1193/1.2360699

Vibration Frequencies of Woodframe Residential Construction

2006· article· en· W2175967895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Spectra · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbient vibrationVibrationStructural engineeringFundamental frequencyShear (geology)Nonlinear systemEngineeringGeologyAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Different methods of vibration measurement, such as ambient and forced vibration techniques, have been used in existing woodframe houses to determine fundamental frequency, but because of the highly nonlinear nature of this type of structural system, the reported results vary significantly. This paper discusses some of the differences of frequency values observed in various experimental studies, and identifies the source of these differences by relating the measured fundamental period to the level of shaking. The experimental results from different full‐scale tests of woodframe houses and single wood shear walls are used in this paper to gain an improved understanding of the dynamic characteristics of this type of construction and to help explain the differences in results from ambient and forced vibration techniques. A simple equation to estimate forced vibration periods from ambient vibration periods is presented, and its possible application in engineering practice is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it