MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176258261 · doi:10.1177/0954406215612814

Base curves of involute cylindrical gears via Aronhold’s first theorem

2015· article· en· W2176258261 on OpenAlexaff
Giorgio Figliolini, Hellmuth Stachel, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvoluteRackEnvelope (radar)Base (topology)Pressure angleGeometryInvolute gearCycloid gearKinematicsLine (geometry)MathematicsStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMathematical analysisMechanical engineeringClassical mechanicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of this paper is the synthesis of the base curves of involute cylindrical gears, for uniform and non-uniform transmission ratio, by means of Aronhold’s first theorem and the return circle. The base curves can be generated in several ways, as reported in the literature, but this approach comes from the kinematics fundamentals; it is, thus, more straightforward than the alternatives for the case of non-uniform transmission ratio, which leads to non-circular gears. The base curves of circular and non-circular gears are obtained by intersecting, at each pitch point, the corresponding return circle with the line of action for a given pressure angle. This is possible for involute cylindrical gears since the tooth profile of the rack is represented by a line, and the conjugate profiles of the two meshing gears can be generated by its envelope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207