MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176356482 · doi:10.1109/tia.2013.2244544

Model-Based Virtual Sensors and Core-Temperature Observers in Thermoforming Applications

2013· article· en· W2176356482 on OpenAlexaff
Rahi Modirnia, Benoît Boulet

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoformingTemperature measurementTemperature controlControllabilityCore (optical fiber)Observer (physics)Mechanical engineeringProcess (computing)Robustness (evolution)Computer scienceInfrared heaterEngineeringControl theory (sociology)InfraredArtificial intelligenceControl (management)ChemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the notion of model-based virtual sensors (MBVSs) and virtual core-temperature observers in a thermoforming process. The concept of MBVSs allows for additional surface-temperature measurement points in addition to the already existing infrared sensors. This leads to improved controllability of the plastic sheet temperature and increased accuracy in temperature zoning, thus eliminating the use of extra infrared sensors, which significantly reduces the cost of the control system. The problem of core sheet temperature measurement is also addressed through the application of a closed-loop Luenberger core-temperature observer to estimate the center-plane temperature of the plastic sheet since it is not practical to have any kind of actual core-temperature measurement during the heating process. The two concepts of virtual sensors and virtual core-temperature observers are then combined to form an overall observer-based closed-loop control system. Finally, the functionality, performance, and robustness of the new system is investigated through simulation of an industrial-type thermoforming machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207