Osseous morphology and spatial relationships of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons of normal and anterior disc positions.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine differences in spatial relationships and osseous morphology between temporomandibular joints with normal and anterior disc positions. Magnetic resonance imaging was employed to determine disc position in 335 temporomandibular joints in 175 subjects (106 female and 69 male) between the ages of 7.27 years and 20.0 years (mean age: 13.08 years). Twelve tomographic variables were measured from preorthodontic tomograms of the same individuals. Tomographic data were cross-referenced with MRI data for those with normal and full anterior disc displacement. Independent sample t-tests revealed significant differences for all measures of joint space, condylar position, and morphology of the articular eminence (P < .05) between joints with normal disc position and with full anterior disc displacement. This study indicated that measures of joint space and eminence morphology might provide diagnostic information for the assessment of joint status in the adolescent population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".