MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176512575

Accurate approximate solution of partial differential equations at off-mesh points

2002· book· en· W2176512575 on OpenAlexaff
W. H. Enright

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollocation (remote sensing)Partial differential equationInterpolation (computer graphics)Polygon meshCollocation methodDomain (mathematical analysis)Set (abstract data type)MathematicsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationDifferential equationOrdinary differential equationMathematical analysisGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

this paper we will introduce a generic approach which can be used to generate approximate solution values at arbitrary points in the domain of interest for any method that determines approximations to the solution and low order derivatives at meshpoints. This approach is based on associating a set of `collocation' points with each mesh element and requiring that the local approximation interpolate the meshpoint data and almost satisfy the partial differential equation at the collocation points. The accuracy associated with this interpolation/collocation approach is consistent with the `meshpoint accuracy' of the underlying method. The approach that we develop applies to a large class of methods and problems. It uses local information only and is therefore particularly suitable for implementation in a parallel or network computing environment. Numerical examples are given for some second order problems in two and three dimensions. Categories and Subject Descriptors: G.1.8 [Num

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207