MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176671065 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.1762

Mémoire, identité, altérité : contribution de la narration à une éthique de la réconciliation

2007· article· fr· W2176671065 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dany Rondeau

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesNarrativePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur la narration comme condition d’une éthique de réconciliation nationale dans les pays en situation de post-conflit, notamment dans le contexte du génocide rwandais. Par sa fonction de donation de sens, de reconstruction identitaire et de constitution d’une mémoire individuelle et collective, la narration donne lieu à une éthique narrative. C’est dans cette perspective que la narration est analysée à partir des trois dimensions temporelles – passé, présent, avenir – qui ensemble reconstruisent l’unité, la continuité et la cohérence de l’existence humaine, mises à mal par la tragédie du génocide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsFrench-language works237,207