MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176738105

Erodibility of cohesive glacial till bed sediments in urban stream channel systems

2011· article· en· W2176738105 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
KhanImran, KostaschukRay

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenetrometerSedimentGeologyGeotechnical engineeringErosionGeomorphologyGlacial periodHydrology (agriculture)AlluviumStream powerSoil scienceSoil water
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major challenge in urbanizing watersheds in southern Ontario is the development of a broader understanding of semi-alluvial stream channels with streambeds and lower banks consisting of consolidated glacial till bed sediment. This investigation focuses on the erosive resistance of two distinct glacial till bed sediments within the Greater Toronto region, the Sunnybrook till and the Halton till. The study reviews the distinct nature and properties of till sediment and compressional and shear strength which can be significant controls on the erosion of the till sediment in stream channels. Critical shear stress and an erodibility coefficient were measured with an in situ jet-tester, and sediment strength using a penetrometer and a shear vane tester. Bulk properties were investigated through sediment cores. From over 50 jet-tests, power-law functions were used to determine erodibility coefficients as a function of critical stress for each till sediment. Empirical relations were developed to estimate critic...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207