MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176793916 · doi:10.1039/c5cc08181e

Even the normal is abnormal: N-heterocyclic carbene C<sup>2</sup> binding to a phosphaalkene without breaking the PC π-bond

2015· article· en· W2176793916 on OpenAlexafffund
Paresh Kumar Majhi, Keith C. F. Chow, Tom H. H. Hsieh, Eric G. Bowes, Gregor Schnakenburg, Pierre Kennepohl, Rainer Streubel, Derek P. Gates

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicN-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersGerman Academic Exchange Service LondonNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsCarbeneChemistryMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of MesP=CPh2 with the least sterically demanding N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC = IMe) results in formation of the 'abnormal' (C(4)-substituted) 4-phosphino-NHC (1). In contrast, reaction with Me2IMe gives the unprecedented 'normal' C(2) adduct, Me2IMe → P(Mes)=CPh2 (2). Particularly striking is the asymmetric and weak bonding of the NHC to the P=C moiety in 2. DFT calculations indicate that the P=C natural bond order in 2 (1.54) still reflects significant π-character to the bond (cf. MesP=CPh2: NBO = 1.98). Further computational analysis suggests that π-delocalization into the remote C-phenyl substituents is key to stabilizing the NHC adduct.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicN-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207