Generic Characteristics of <I>Chrysopodes</I> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), with New Larval Descriptions and a Review of Species from the United States and Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many of the adult features that are considered diagnostic for Chrysopodes occur in other New World chrysopid genera; a stable and phylogenetically significant generic classification requires additional definitive characters. The current study demonstrates a number of morphological characters in the larvae that provide strong evidence for the validity of the genus and also provide a foundation for broadening and refining the definition of the genus. For example, the absence of a gonapsis no longer serves as a diagnostic character for Chrysopodes. Moreover, based primarily on larval characteristics but also on adult features, the widely distributed Nearctic species Ceraeochrysa placita (Banks) is now transferred to Chrysopodes. Finally, the manuscript reviews the systematics of the two Chrysopodes species reported from the United States; the adults are characterized and illustrated, the larvae are described, and biological data are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it