MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177050153

Feature Space Selection and Combination for Native Language Identification

2013· article· en· W2177050153 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Cyril Goutte, Serge Léger, Marine Carpuat

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAuthorship Attribution and Profiling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceExploitFeature selectionSpellingFeature vectorNatural language processingSupport vector machineVariety (cybernetics)Feature (linguistics)Machine learningLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We decribe the submissions made by the National Research Council Canada to the Native Language Identification (NLI) shared task. Our submissions rely on a Support Vector Machine classifier, various feature spaces using a variety of lexical, spelling, and syntactic features, and on a simple model combination strategy relying on a majority vote between classifiers. Somewhat surprisingly, a classifier relying on purely lexical features performed very well and proved difficult to outperform significantly using various combinations of feature spaces. However, the combination of multiple predictors allowed to exploit their different strengths and provided a significant boost in performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingFrench-language works237,207