MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GENOTYPE-DEPENDENT SURVIVAL, GROWTH, AND PRODUCTION IN CULTURED BLUE MUSSELS, MYTILUS SPP.: RESULTS OF A RECIPROCAL SEED TRANSFER EXPERIMENT

2006· article· en· W2177097309 on OpenAlexaffabout
Randy W. Penney, M Jeanne Hart, Nadine D. Templeman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Shellfish Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHybridMytilusAnimal scienceBlue musselDry weightFleshBotanySelective breedingMusselHorticultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reciprocal mussel seed transfer experiment was conducted involving two farm sites (Charles Arm and Thwart Island) whose seedstocks differed significantly in their respective compositions of Mytilus edulis L., M. trossulus Gould and hybrids. Electrophoretic variation at the mannose phosphate isomerase (Mpi) enzyme locus was used to classify the two species and their hybrids. Survival and growth in shell length, wet weight, shell weight and flesh weight were monitored over a 14-mo period. Both stock groups originating from Thwart Island seed (TI reared on its native site and the transferred TI-X stock) and the transferred stock group originating from Charles Arm seed (CA-X) showed no evidence of genotype-dependent variability in survival whereas, in the Charles Arm seed reared on its native site (CA), the proportion of M. edulis declined in relation to M. trossulus. There was no evidence of either a survival advantage or disadvantage in hybrids. After 14 mo, both transferred stocks (CA-X and TI-X) had comparatively higher frequencies of M. edulis and hybrids and lower frequencies of M. trossulus than did their respective nontransferred stocks (CA and TI) indicating a significant genotype x site interaction effect on survival. Significant species, stock, stock × time, species × time and stock × species × time effects on shell length, wet weight, shell weight and flesh weight occurred. Intrastock growth rates of M. trossulus were lower than M. edulis and hybrids for shell length (3 of 4 stocks), and for the 3 weight variables, wet weight, shell weight and flesh weight (4 of 4 stocks). These results support the conclusion that growth is genotype-dependent in rope-cultured mussel populations and that these differences in weight growth favoring M. edulis are maintained when such stocks are transferred to other sites. Mussel biomass (kg m−1) was similar for the CA, CA-X and TI-X stock groups and lower for the TI stock group. Rates of production (wet weight) over the 14-mo growout period were similar for the CA, CA-X and TI stock groups and significantly higher for the TI-X stock group. In both stock groups originating from Thwart Island seed (TI reared on its native site and the transferred TI-X stock), the intrastock rates of production of M. edulis and hybrids were significantly greater than sympatric M. trossulus. However, in the transferred Charles Arm stock (CA-X), the rates of production were similar in M. edulis and M. trossulus and significantly greater in hybrids. In the Charles Arm stock reared on its native site (CA), the rate of production of M. trossulus was significantly greater than either M. edulis or hybrids. We conclude M. edulis and hybrids have intrinsically greater rates of weight growth, but not necessarily length growth, than does M. trossulus. Neither M. edulis nor M. trossulus nor hybrids have consistently greater rates of survival or production in suspended rope culture. These results are discussed in the context of a directed seed-stocking program involving the transfer of M. edulis seedstocks to sites whose native stocks have a high M. trossulus component as a means to enhance commercial mussel production within the M. edulis-M. trossulus hybridization zone in Atlantic Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Shellfish ResearchSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207