MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2177190890

Resources to help you keep current.

2009· article· en· W2177190890 on OpenAlexaff
Darlene Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsycINFOCINAHLRSSWorld Wide WebCochrane LibraryComputer scienceTable (database)MEDLINEField (mathematics)Table of contentsCover (algebra)Information retrievalLibrary scienceData scienceDatabaseEngineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous articles in this series covered basic and advanced features of the PubMed database and introduced readers to select health-related databases including PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science). The final article in this series will cover selected resources/services that may assist you in keeping up to date with the literature published in your field including e-journals, e-table of contents, automatic search updates and RSS feeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.020
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7850.814

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicHealth Sciences Research and Education→French-language works237,207→