MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177230932 · doi:10.1093/cid/civ983

The Emergence of Zoonotic<i>Onchocerca lupi</i>Infection in the United States – A Case-Series

2015· article· en· W2177230932 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T. Cantey, Jessica Weeks, Morven S. Edwards, Suchitra Rao, Gholamabbas Amin Ostovar, Walter Dehority, Maria Alzona, Sara Swoboda, Brooke A. Christiaens, Wassim Ballan, John C. Hartley, Andrew Terranella, Jill E. Weatherhead, James J. Dunn, Douglas P. Marx, John Hicks, Ronald A. Rauch, Christiana Smith, Megan K. Dishop, Michael H. Handler, Roy Dudley, Kote Chundu, Dan Hobohm, Iman Feiz-Erfan, Joseph Hakes, R. Stephen Berry, Shelly Stepensaski, Benjamin Greenfield, Laura Shroeder, Henry Bishop, Marcos de Almeida, Blaine A. Mathison, Mark Eberhard

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsOnchocerca volvulusMedicineTransmission (telecommunications)SerologyZoonotic diseaseDiseaseOnchocerciasisVirologyImmunologyPathologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case-series describes the 6 human infections with Onchocerca lupi, a parasite known to infect cats and dogs, that have been identified in the United States since 2013. Unlike cases reported outside the country, the American patients have not had subconjunctival nodules but have manifested more invasive disease (eg, spinal, orbital, and subdermal nodules). Diagnosis remains challenging in the absence of a serologic test. Treatment should be guided by what is done for Onchocerca volvulus as there are no data for O. lupi. Available evidence suggests that there may be transmission in southwestern United States, but the risk of transmission to humans is not known. Research is needed to better define the burden of disease in the United States and develop appropriately-targeted prevention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207