MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177268033

Glass Ceiling: Role of Women in the Corporate World

2006· article· en· W2177268033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCompetition Forum · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlass ceilingGender diversityDiversity (politics)HierarchyExecutive summaryPrivate sectorFace (sociological concept)Senior managementBusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsCorporate governanceSociologyLawSocial scienceFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Twenty years ago, the term was coined by the Wall Street Journal to describe the apparent barriers that prevent women and minorities from reaching the top of the corporate hierarchy. Several studies, both academic and governmental, have shown that despite the efforts to increase diversity, women still face the glass-ceiling when it comes to top management jobs in the private sector, may it be Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) or board members. This study takes a more focused approach to examining the trend in gender diversity. We used data on publicly traded corporations registered in the State of Texas to examine the existence of the glass ceiling effect in Texas. The data for this study was gathered from ReferenceUSA, which is a subscription database that contains information on more than twelve million U.S. businesses and one million Canadian businesses. Keywords: Glass Ceiling effect, Texas Corporations INTRODUCTION The issue of diversity with respect to women heading big corporations has been an important source of discussion among researchers as well as practitioners and with good reason. Twenty years ago, the term was coined by the Wall Street Journal to describe the apparent barriers that prevent women and minorities from reaching the top of the corporate hierarchy. Several studies, both academic and governmental, have shown that despite the efforts to increase diversity, women still face the glass-ceiling when it comes to top management jobs in the private sector, may it be Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) or board members. Examining statistics on who gets promoted into management and, particularly, who gets the top spots in any organization show that even employers with the best general employment diversity records do not fare as well in fostering diversity in organizational upper atmosphere. The higher the position, in both, the private and public sectors, the less likely that women or minorities will fill it. A federal study conducted in 1995 found that males held 95 percent of all top management positions (Economist, 2005). It was an amazing statistic considering that in 1995 women accounted for 45.7 percent of America's jobs. Despite the efforts by organizations to improve gender diversity at the top, the percentage of women in top management positions increased only slightly to 8 percent in the year 2004. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) reported in 2004 that although 48 percent of U.S. jobs were held by women only 8 percent of senior managers were women.1 There have been general studies that examined the issue of gender diversity in the academic literature. A recent study by Arfken, Bellar, and Helms (2004), found the glass ceiling effect to be very prominent in corporations registered in Tennessee. The authors reported that only 5.8 percent of board seats in publicly held companies in Tennessee were held by women in 2002, as compared to 5.4 percent of board seats in 1996. We selected Texas because it is the second largest U.S state in area (after Alaska) and in population (after California). In 2005, Texas had a gross state product of $982.4 billion, the second highest in America after California2. As of 2006, Texas, for the first time, has more Fortune 500 company headquarters (56) than any other state. This has been attributed to both the growth in population in Texas and the rise of oil prices in 2005, which resulted in the growth in revenues of many Texas oil drilling and processing companies. The purpose of this study is to examine the existence of the glass ceiling in Texas. With the ever expanding economy in Texas, companies will have to address the issue of gender diversity in the workforce. This study takes a more focused approach to examining the trend in gender diversity. We wanted to investigate the existence of the glass ceiling effect in Texas and its extent. We used data on publicly traded corporations registered in the State of Texas. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it