MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2177268033

Glass Ceiling: Role of Women in the Corporate World

2006· article· en· W2177268033 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCompetition Forum · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Diversity and Inequality
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlass ceilingGender diversityDiversity (politics)HierarchyExecutive summaryPrivate sectorFace (sociological concept)Senior managementBusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsCorporate governanceSociologyLawSocial scienceFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Twenty years ago, the term was coined by the Wall Street Journal to describe the apparent barriers that prevent women and minorities from reaching the top of the corporate hierarchy. Several studies, both academic and governmental, have shown that despite the efforts to increase diversity, women still face the glass-ceiling when it comes to top management jobs in the private sector, may it be Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) or board members. This study takes a more focused approach to examining the trend in gender diversity. We used data on publicly traded corporations registered in the State of Texas to examine the existence of the glass ceiling effect in Texas. The data for this study was gathered from ReferenceUSA, which is a subscription database that contains information on more than twelve million U.S. businesses and one million Canadian businesses. Keywords: Glass Ceiling effect, Texas Corporations INTRODUCTION The issue of diversity with respect to women heading big corporations has been an important source of discussion among researchers as well as practitioners and with good reason. Twenty years ago, the term was coined by the Wall Street Journal to describe the apparent barriers that prevent women and minorities from reaching the top of the corporate hierarchy. Several studies, both academic and governmental, have shown that despite the efforts to increase diversity, women still face the glass-ceiling when it comes to top management jobs in the private sector, may it be Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) or board members. Examining statistics on who gets promoted into management and, particularly, who gets the top spots in any organization show that even employers with the best general employment diversity records do not fare as well in fostering diversity in organizational upper atmosphere. The higher the position, in both, the private and public sectors, the less likely that women or minorities will fill it. A federal study conducted in 1995 found that males held 95 percent of all top management positions (Economist, 2005). It was an amazing statistic considering that in 1995 women accounted for 45.7 percent of America's jobs. Despite the efforts by organizations to improve gender diversity at the top, the percentage of women in top management positions increased only slightly to 8 percent in the year 2004. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) reported in 2004 that although 48 percent of U.S. jobs were held by women only 8 percent of senior managers were women.1 There have been general studies that examined the issue of gender diversity in the academic literature. A recent study by Arfken, Bellar, and Helms (2004), found the glass ceiling effect to be very prominent in corporations registered in Tennessee. The authors reported that only 5.8 percent of board seats in publicly held companies in Tennessee were held by women in 2002, as compared to 5.4 percent of board seats in 1996. We selected Texas because it is the second largest U.S state in area (after Alaska) and in population (after California). In 2005, Texas had a gross state product of $982.4 billion, the second highest in America after California2. As of 2006, Texas, for the first time, has more Fortune 500 company headquarters (56) than any other state. This has been attributed to both the growth in population in Texas and the rise of oil prices in 2005, which resulted in the growth in revenues of many Texas oil drilling and processing companies. The purpose of this study is to examine the existence of the glass ceiling in Texas. With the ever expanding economy in Texas, companies will have to address the issue of gender diversity in the workforce. This study takes a more focused approach to examining the trend in gender diversity. We wanted to investigate the existence of the glass ceiling effect in Texas and its extent. We used data on publicly traded corporations registered in the State of Texas. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,481
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,587

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle