MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Staging, Migration, and Winter Distribution of Canada and Cackling Geese Staging in Interior Alaska

2006· article· en· W2177271711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael W. Eichholz, James S. Sedinger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wildlife Management · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGooseGeographyDeltaBrantaFisheryEcologyArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The breeding stock composition and ecology of Canada (Branta canadensis) and cackling (B. hutchinsii) geese, collectively white-cheeked geese, staging in interior Alaska and wintering in the Pacific Northwest is poorly understood. We captured, measured, and applied neck collars to white-cheeked geese during spring and fall staging near Fairbanks and Delta Junction, Alaska, USA, to study their breeding stock composition, migration, and winter distribution. We measured exposed culmen, flattened wing chord, total tarsus, and body length of geese staging in interior Alaska to assist with determination of breeding stock. The first principal components, as well as a univariate measurement of exposed culmen, indicated geese trapped in Fairbanks in the fall were larger on average than geese trapped in Delta Junction in either spring or fall. We observed or recovered most of the banded geese detected in fall and winter in central British Columbia, Canada, central Washington, USA, and north-central Oregon, USA, east of the Cascade Mountains, with relatively few observations in western British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon. We found no evidence of movement between wintering areas on the east and west sides of the Cascade Mountains. Geese that we trapped during spring staging in Delta Junction were more often observed on the west side of the Cascade Mountains than geese trapped during fall staging in Fairbanks. Most (93%) geese trapped during fall staging in both Fairbanks and Delta Junction, however, wintered east of the Cascade Mountains. After-hatch-year (AHY) geese from interior Alaska staging areas observed on the west side of the Cascade Mountains were structurally smaller on average than AHY geese observed on the east side of the Cascade Mountains. Our results indicate fall staging white-cheeked geese in Fairbanks were predominantly 1 breeding stock of white-cheeked geese, while fall and spring staging white-cheeked geese in Delta Junction comprised at least 2 stocks of white-cheeked geese. Based on our findings, we recommend separate harvest and management strategies be considered for small white-cheeked geese migrating through coastal and central British Columbia and wintering east and west of the Cascade Mountains in Washington and Oregon to avoid potential overharvest of independent breeding stocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wildlife ManagementSame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207