MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MOVEMENTS AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF WILD HOUSE MICE (<i>MUS DOMESTICUS</i>) IN THE WHEATLANDS OF NORTHWESTERN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

2000· article· en· W2177436889 on OpenAlex
Lisa K. Chambers, Grant R. Singleton, Charles J. Krebs

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mammalogy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNorthwestern University
KeywordsHome rangeSeasonal breederHouse miceBiologyRange (aeronautics)House mouseZoologyEcologyDemographyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From September 1996 to May 1997, 187 wild house mice (Mus domesticus) were fitted with radiotransmitters at an agricultural site in the wheatlands of northwestern Victoria, Australia, to examine movements and social organization. Males had slightly larger home-range areas than females. Home-range size was highly variable (0.0002–8.024 ha) but could not be predicted from body size or body condition in males and females, or by whether females were breeding. Mice were site-attached during the breeding season, with extensive intersexual overlap of home ranges but variable intrasexual overlap. Home ranges were significantly larger during the nonbreeding season compared with the breeding season. Evidence existed for exclusive home-range use by females at all densities of mice, low to moderate home-range overlap for males when densities were low and increasing, and an apparent switch to a more gregarious phase in male mice when the breeding season ceased and densities were high. Nonbreeding mice seemed to be nomadic when densities were low, which is consistent with an earlier study of home ranges and social organization of mice on the Darling Downs, Queensland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it