MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177620811 · doi:10.5753/cbie.wcbie.2015.105

BRAVO Sistema Web de Apoio à Pesquisa em Educação

2015· article· pt· W2177620811 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Raphael de Sousa, Luciano Édipo Pereira da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais ... Workshops do Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Bureau for International Education
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo deste trabalho é expor a importância dos métodos de pesquisa quantitativos utilizando-se bancos de dados assim como apresentar o desenvolvimento de uma ferramenta livre de apoio à pesquisa em educação BRAVO. A ferramenta oferece, de forma simplificada, a geração de filtros dinâmicos e relatórios gerenciais para pesquisadores da área da educação e afins, utilizando-se da extração de conhecimento alimentado pela fonte de microdados disponibilizados pelo Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas em Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP), do espaço temporal 2007-2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnais ... Workshops do Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na EducaçãoSame topicEducation and Digital TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207