MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177638971 · doi:10.1179/174329308x349520

Cracking in dissimilar Mg alloy friction stir spot welds

2008· article· en· W2177638971 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology of Welding & Joining · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLiquationMaterials scienceSpot weldingEutectic systemFriction stir weldingMetallurgyWeldingCrackingMicrostructureHeat-affected zoneComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cracking during dissimilar friction stir spot welding of thixomoulded AM60 and AZ91 sheet materials is investigated. Liquation cracking occurs in the thermomechanically affected zone (TMAZ) region during friction stir spot welding when AZ91 material is the lower sheet in the dissimilar AM60/AZ91 sandwich. A TMAZ microstructure comprising elongated α-Mg grains and aligned Mg 17 Al 12 is created during the tool penetration stage in spot welding and melted eutectic film formation is facilitated since the temperature in the stir zone (504°C) is much higher than the α-Mg+Mg 17 Al 12 eutectic temperature (437°C). There is no evidence of liquation cracking in the stir zone or the TMAZ region of AM60 sheet when it is the lower sheet in the dissimilar sandwich. However, liquation cracking is observed in the upper sheet material (AZ91) in the location beneath the tool shoulder close to its periphery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it