MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2177678390 · doi:10.1139/p07-091

On quantum scattering by δ'(x)} and quasi δ'(x) distributions

2007· article· en· W2177678390 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rushikesh K. Dubey, V. J. Menon, Mukesh Kumar Pandey, Dharmendra Tripathi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity Grants Commission
KeywordsPhysicsScatteringAmplitudeCauchy distributionWave functionScattering amplitudeQuantum mechanicsFunction (biology)Reflection (computer programming)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The zero-range interaction U(x) occurring in the one-dimensional, time-independent Schrödinger equation is regarded as a smoothed distribution characterized by a tiny length scale b such that the origin becomes an ordinary point. A neighbourhood around the origin is scanned by defining inner demarcation points a±≡ ±b/N and outer demarcation points b±≡ ±Nb with N >> 1. Then a sequence of simple Lemmas permits (i) construction of a systematic procedure for simultaneously solving the scattering wave function ψ(0) at the origin, its derivative ψ'(0) there, the transmission amplitude B, as well as the reflection amplitude D; and (ii) unambiguous application to scattering by the previously known δ'(x) and newly proposed quasi δ'(x) potentials in the Cauchy representation of various distributions.PACS No.: 03.65.Nk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectral Theory in Mathematical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207