The Effect of Different Body Conformation Types on Beef Quality in Young Bulls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chemical composition analysis of average meat samples and M. longissimus dorsi testify that the greatest nutrients variability characterizes fat, the protein and mineral substances of carcasses edible part possess relative stability. In the study of qualitative structure of slaughter products the general regularity was revealed – increase of dry matter and fat contents and decrease in moisture with age. The process of fat deposition in the pulp of carcasses of compact body type genotypes was more intensive. That led to the maximum size (38,04%) of dry matter contents. Intensive accumulation of adipose tissue in compact body conformation group of bull-calves already had began with one-year-old age and to 15-month age the protein and fat ratio reached 1:0,65. At the age of 21 months tall animals were the best protein and fat ratio: they had ratio 1:0.83 instead 1:1.28 and 1:0.99 at compact and the medium contemporaries. Compact bull-calves had the highest of a forage’s protein and energy expenses into own body nutrients, the smallest had tall contemporaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".