Rotational analysis of bands of the A – X transition of the C3Ar van der Waals complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rotational analyses have been carried out for four of the strongest bands of the Ã-X̃ transition of the C3Ar van der Waals complex, at 393 and 399 nm. These bands lie near the 02(-)0-000 and 04(-)0-000 bands of the Ã(1)Πu-X̃(1)Σ(+) g transition of C3 and form two close pairs, each consisting of a type A and a type C band of an asymmetric top, about 4 cm(-1) apart. Only K″ = even lines are found, showing that the complex has two equivalent carbon atoms (I = 0), and must be T-shaped, or nearly so. Strong a- and b-axis electronic-rotational (Coriolis) coupling occurs between the upper states of a pair, since they correlate with a (1)Πu vibronic state of C3, where the degeneracy is lifted in the lower symmetry of the complex. Least squares rotational fits, including the coupling, have given the rotational constants for both electronic states: the van der Waals bond lengths are 3.81 and 3.755 Å, respectively, in the ground and excited electronic states. For the ground state our new quantum chemical calculations, using the Multi-Channel Time-Dependent Hartree method, indicate that the C3 unit is non-linear, and that the complex does not have a rigid-molecule structure, existing instead as a superposition of arrowhead (↑) and distorted Y-shaped (Y) structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".