PAIR FORMATION AND COPULATION BEHAVIOR IN LEAST FLYCATCHER CLUSTERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Least Flycatcher Empidonax minimus pairs form dense clusters of territories on the breeding grounds. We describe pair formation and copulation behavior (both within- and extra-pair) in Least Flycatcher clusters. Pair formation involved a complex behavioral sequence of trill vocalizations and visual display. Within-pair copulations were five times more likely to achieve cloacal contact than were extra-pair copulations. Least Flycatchers exhibited an overall within-pair mating effort of 2.0 ± 0.5 events pair−1 hr−1 compared to an extra-pair mating effort of 1.8 ± 0.3 events pair−1 hr−1. Within- and extra-pair mating behavior by focal birds were distinctly different with respect to rate, conspicuousness, duration, aggression intensity, and pre-copulatory display. The rate of territory incursions for extra-pair copulations was high. We discuss copulation behavior in the context of male and female mating tactics, and highlight the disparity in our knowledge of mating behavior in other members of this genus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".