MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178509629 · doi:10.1109/tim.2003.809116

Design of a wireless communications module for telemetry in civil infrastructure monitoring

2003· article· en· W2178509629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNortel (Canada)Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWirelessTelemetryBlock (permutation group theory)Computer scienceSoftwareWireless site surveyEngineeringWi-Fi arrayFixed wirelessEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A design methodology dedicated to a wireless communications module for telemetry in civil infrastructure monitoring is proposed. Particular attention is paid to the design decisions concerning the individual wireless communications blocks, i.e., the protocol, the modem, and the radio frequency block. A design example based on the use of a commercial development kit is detailed. A simulation software, designed for evaluation of the wireless communications module, is developed and tested. The results of evaluation are presented. Some conclusions are drawn concerning the applicability of the proposed methodology for designing a specific wireless communications module for various telemetry systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it