A Practical Real-Time OPF Method Using New Triangular Approximate Model of Wind Electric Generators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-term output forecast of wind electric generators (WEG) has uncertainties. Optimal power flow (OPF) schedules that consider forecasted output of WEGs carry risk due to these uncertainties. This risk can be quantified as expected energy not served (EENS). Traditional methods such as Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) with OPF can capture the stochastic nature of WEG output while considering ac transmission system constraints to simultaneously minimize risks from EENS and total operating costs, analyze influence of wind variability on total costs, correlate reserves and wind variability, etc. However, the MCS technique is extremely time consuming and computationally burdensome. This paper proposes a new triangular approximate distribution (TAD) model that very closely represents the normal probabilistic distribution function of forecasted wind speed to capture stochastic information of WEG output forecast and quantify EENS. This TAD model is used to formulate the proposed OPF method considering ac transmission systems to: 1) simultaneously minimize risk due to EENS and total operating costs and 2) analyze the impact of wind variability on system parameters such as EENS, operating costs, location marginal prices, and reserve costs. Tests on IEEE test systems reveal that the proposed method is accurate, fast, and suitable for real-time use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it