CALCIUM AVAILABILITY LIMITS REPRODUCTIVE OUTPUT OF TREE SWALLOWS (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) IN A NONACIDIFIED LANDSCAPE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breeding birds require high levels of energy and certain nutrients, such as calcium. The extent to which calcium limits reproduction in wild birds is unclear. We performed a supplementation experiment to determine whether calcium limits the reproductive output of free-ranging insectivorous Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), a species whose usual diet contains little calcium. Providing supplemental calcium in the form of crushed oyster shell did not affect clutch initiation date, but it caused birds that had not started constructing a nest when we first detected them on the study area to begin laying sooner, which suggests that calcium reduced the length of the prelaying period. Supplemented females produced larger eggs, and that effect was most pronounced among females in good body condition. There was a trend for supplemented birds to produce larger clutches, and their clutches had significantly greater total mass than those of control birds. Supplemented birds, in particular those breeding late in the season, also hatched significantly more eggs. Our results suggest that calcium availability may limit some aspects of avian reproduction, even in nonacidified landscapes like our study area, where levels of calcium in the soil are high. La Disponibilidad de Calcio Limita el Rendimiento Reproductivo de Tachycineta bicolor en un Paisaje no Acidificado
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".