MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>SEMITUBINA YUKONENSIS</i>NEW SPECIES, FIRST OCCURRENCE OF THIS BIOGEOGRAPHICALLY DISTINCTIVE OLD WORLD REALM GASTROPOD GENUS IN THE LOWER DEVONIAN OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

2001· article· en· W2178782396 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert B. Blodgett, Jiří Frýda, Alfred C. Lenz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paleontology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianPaleontologyGenusFaunaGeologyArchaeologyGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the rapidly expanding knowledge of Lower Devonian brachiopod faunas of the Western Cordillera of Canada (Lenz, 1976, 1977a, 1977b, 1982; Ludvigsen, 1970; Perry, 1984; Perry and Lenz, 1978; Perry et al., 1974, 1981), equivalent data on coeval gastropod faunas from this region are non-existent; to date, no publications have appeared in which gastropods have been described. Blodgett et al. (1988, table 1) provided faunal lists for two Lower Devonian localities in Western Canada: 1) Lochkovian-Emsian age collections from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, collected by the late D. G. Perry as part of his Ph.D. dissertation (Perry, 1984); and 2) an early Emsian collection from the Mt. Lloyd George area, British Columbia. We are currently examining the gastropod material recovered by A. C. Lenz from his richly diverse collections in the Royal Creek area, Yukon Territory, equivalent in age to those gathered by D. G. Perry from the Mackenzie Mountains. This note is the first of several papers focused on these paleobiogeographically significant faunas, and it is our desire to ultimately make clear the character of this Early Devonian province, which appears to include strata of British Columbia, Yukon and Northwest Territories, as well as the non-accreted portion of adjacent east-central Alaska.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207