MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178806558

Analysis of How the Local University Library to Service for the New Rural Culture Construction

2015· article· en· W2178806558 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ying Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRural areaModernization theorySocialismMilestoneService (business)ChinaPolitical scienceScientific developmentPublic administrationEconomic growthEconomic systemEconomyCommunismEconomicsLawPoliticsGeographyDevelopment (topology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The construction of socialist new countryside is a practical example of scientific socialism theory in China, and it is the performance of the Party Central Committee to implement the scientific concept of development. The construction of new socialist countryside is an important historical task in the process of modernization, and it is a milestone in the construction of scientific socialism. To carry out socialist new rural culture construction is an important content of the construction of socialist new countryside. This study analyzes the current situation of the construction of socialist new rural culture, and considers that the construction of the new socialist countryside is the need of the construction for local colleges and universities. And it analyzes the advantages of local colleges and universities to serve the construction of socialist new countryside, and puts forward the corresponding measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicIdeological and Political EducationFrench-language works237,207