MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lagrangian Observations of the Deep Western Boundary Current in the North Atlantic Ocean.

2000· article· en· W2178905774 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amy S. Bower, Heather D. Hunt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGulf StreamBoundary currentGeologyOceanographyCurrent (fluid)Water massEddyEntrainment (biomusicology)DrifterSTREAMSOcean currentMeander (mathematics)Trough (economics)LagrangianMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors analyze the trajectories of 18 RAFOS floats, launched in the deep western boundary current (DWBC) between the Grand Banks and Cape Hatteras to investigate the kinematics and dynamics in the region where the DWBC crosses under the Gulf Stream, near 36°N (the “crossover region”). Floats deployed in the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) maximum associated with upper Labrador Sea Water (depth ∼800 m) illustrate the entrainment process of this water mass into the Gulf Stream. The behavior of the floats (and fluid parcels) in the crossover region is strongly dependent on the meandering of the Gulf Stream. When the stream is close to its mean position, fluid parcels entrained from the upper DWBC travel along the northern edge of the stream. When a meander trough is present downstream of the entrainment location, DWBC fluid parcels cross the Gulf Stream and sometimes are expelled on the south side. This represents a previously unrecognized mechanism for transporting upper Labrador Sea Water properties across the Gulf Stream. Floats deployed in the DWBC near the deep CFC maximum that identifies overflow water from the Nordic seas (depth ∼3000 m) show a bifurcation in fluid parcel trajectories in the crossover region: fluid parcels that intersect the stream farther west tend to cross more directly and smoothly under the stream, while fluid parcels that hit the stream farther east exhibit more eddy motion and are more likely to be diverted into the interior along the Gulf Stream path. The deep float observations also reveal directly that the deep DWBC crosses under the Gulf Stream while conserving potential vorticity by sliding down the continental slope, as first conceptualized in a steady, two-layer model of the crossover. While potential vorticity is conserved along the deep float tracks on the short timescales associated with crossing under the Gulf Stream (up to a month), potential vorticity decreases over the longer timescales required for fluid parcels to transit the entire crossover region (several months to a year), consistent with what would be expected from eddy mixing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207