MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178931426 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.05427

A New Matching Algorithm for Multidimensional Persistence

2015· preprint· en· W2178931426 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Madjid Állili, Tomasz Kaczyński, Claudia Landi, Filippo Masoni

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopological and Geometric Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGruppo Nazionale per le Strutture Algebriche, Geometriche e le loro ApplicazioniIstituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica "Francesco Severi"
KeywordsSimplicial complexPersistent homologyMathematicsSimplexSimplicial homologyMatching (statistics)Simplicial approximation theoremh-vectorCombinatoricsComputationFunction (biology)AlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsSimplicial setPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithm is presented that constructs an acyclic partial matching on the cells of a given simplicial complex from a vector-valued function defined on the vertices and extended to each simplex by taking the least common upper bound of the values on its vertices. The resulting acyclic partial matching may be used to construct a reduced filtered complex with the same multidimensional persistent homology as the original simplicial complex filtered by the sublevel sets of the function. Numerical tests show that in practical cases the rate of reduction in the number of cells achieved by the algorithm is substantial. This promises to be useful for the computation of multidimensional persistent homology of simplicial complexes filtered by sublevel sets of vector-valued functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.091 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207