Bibliographic record
Abstract
In analyses of the key changes that have taken place in the international organization of capitalism, it has been argued that the shift from Fordism to post‐Fordism has transformed the material realities of peoples' everyday lives and their forms of subjectivity and collective identity. Universalist forms of identification, especially class, it is argued, have given way to forms of affiliation based on the particularisms of ethnicity, nationalism, regionalism, and other cultural affinities. The theoretical weight accorded to class to explain the complexities of change under late capitalism has declined as analysts have turned increasingly to the study of nationalism, regionalism, and ethnicity in order to apprehend the dynamics of contemporary societies, particularly where ethnic conflict has become salient in regional and national politics. Yet, the extent to which universalistic forms of affiliation have been superseded by particularistic forms of identity in contemporary consciousness is the subject of much debate. By drawing on fieldwork undertaken among the family farmers of rural Languedoc, I argue that class maintains its potency both as a subjective category and an analytical category. Further, I show that class remains indispensable to understanding the nature of change in late capitalism. [Post–Fordism, class, identity, France, regionalism, Occitan]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".