MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179063140 · doi:10.21831/socia.v11i2.5301

Dampak Sistem Tanam Paksa terhadap Dinamika Perekonomian Petani Jawa 1830-1870

2015· article· id· W2179063140 on OpenAlexaff
Hendra Kurniawan

Bibliographic record

VenueSOCIA Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Agroindustry Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi dampak sistem tanam paksa terhadap Dinamika Perekonomian Petani Jawa Tahun 1830-1870. Metode penelitian menggunakan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pasca bubarnya kongsi dagang VOC menimbulkan kebijakan baru di Hindia Belanda. Atas berbagai pertimbangan ekonomi maka pemerintah kolonial Belanda melaksanakan Sistem Tanam Paksa(Cultuurstelsel) dalam kurun waktu hampir 50 tahun. Sistem ini membawa banyak perubahan dalam kehidupan petani di Jawa.Sistem Tanam Paksa telah mengenalkan petani pada sistem tanam yang lebih modern. Kondisi ini membuat ekonomi pangan memiliki pondasi yang semakin mantap. Pada masa ini pula terbuka peluang bagi tumbuhnya ekonomi masyarakat tani. Perekonomian subsisten perlahan bergeser menjadi perekonomian uang. Akan tetapi bagaimanapun penyimpangan dalam pelaksanaan Tanam Paksa pada akhirnyasemakin menambah derita penduduk jajahan. Kata kunci:tanam paksa, perekonomian, petani Jawa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSOCIA Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu SosialSame topicAgriculture and Agroindustry StudiesFrench-language works237,207