MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anatomy and systematics of<i>Plesiobaena antiqua</i>(Testudines; Baenidae) from the mid-Campanian Judith River Group of Alberta, Canada

2003· article· en· W2179189967 on OpenAlexaffabout
Donald B. Brinkman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystematicsSkullPaleontologyCretaceousSubgenusGeologyBiologyZoologyTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT New material of Plesiobaena antiqua from the mid-Campanian Judith River Group of Alberta, Canada, fully documents the skeleton in this species and provides evidence regarding variation within the taxon. Size-independent variation is present in the size of the nasals. Variation in the degree of entry of the frontal into the orbital margin is size-related. The shell varies in the presence or absence of the seventh neural, presence of a ninth neural, and fusion of the eleventh and twelfth peripherals. Plesiobaena antiqua is restricted to the Campanian. The late Maastrichtian specimens previously included in the species differ in the absence of the following features: pointed crista supraoccipitalis, parietal-postorbital sutures strongly divergent from midline, maxilla meeting postorbital excluding jugal from orbit margin, short contact between pterygoids at midline, fused first and second peripheral, and first marginal located mostly, or entirely, on nuchal. The late Maastrichtian specimens are distinct from the Paleocene species P. putorius in the degree of development of the skull roof and presence of sulci on the skull roof, but the two taxa share two derived features suggesting that they form a monophyletic clade relative to P. antiqua. The distribution of P. antiqua within the Campanian of North America suggests that it was a member of a northern faunal assemblage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vertebrate PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207