Repellency of a Wireworm, <I>Agriotes obscurus</I> (Coleoptera: Elateridae), on Exposure to Synthetic Insecticides in a Soil-Less Bioassay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A soil-less bioassay arena to test repellency of wireworms (A. obscurus) to insecticides and carrier solvents is described. The bioassay and variables measured distinguish between shorter-range (contact and/or volatile) and longer-range (volatile) repellency. Wireworm positions are recorded every 3 s for 20 min, and average speed, rate of slowing, and longer- and shorter-range repellent behaviors calculated. Shorter-range repellency is determined with a Wireworm Repellency Score (WRS, range 0-100), calculated before contact and after contact with test chemicals. Of two carrier solvents tested, wireworms were strongly repelled by acetone (WRS = 57) but not by water (WRS = 1) when introduced to the bioassay arenas immediately after chemical inoculation. When bioassay arenas were assembled/sealed 2 min after inoculation, acetone elicited no repellency (WRS = 2). When dissolved in acetone in bioassays assembled with a 2-min delay, imidacloprid, chlorpyrifos, lindane, and tefluthrin elicited slight to moderate repellency at the highest concentrations tested (WRS = 30, 48, 42, and 49, respectively). Both longer- and shorter-range repellency increased over the duration of the observation period for lindane and tefluthrin, and shorter-range repellency also increased over the duration of the observation period for chlorpyrifos. Removal of volatiles in the bioassay arena by vacuum considerably affected wireworm movement in the arena, with the repellency elicited by acetone and lindane being significantly reduced. Clothianidin elicited no longer- or shorter-range repellency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".