MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179224647 · doi:10.1149/05841.0055ecst

pH Effect on Sulfur-Induced Passivity Degradation of Alloy 800 in Simulated Crevice Chemistries

2014· article· en· W2179224647 on OpenAlexaff
Da‐Hai Xia, Renkang Zhu, Chen Shen, Yashar Behnamian, Yucheng Lu, Jing‐Li Luo, Stan Klimas

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrevice corrosionSulfurPassivityChemistryAlloyAdsorptionPassivationDegradation (telecommunications)Inorganic chemistryDielectric spectroscopyElectrochemistryChlorideImpurityMetallurgyElectrodeMaterials sciencePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of pH on sulfur-induced passivity degradation of Alloy 800 in simulated crevice chemistries were evaluated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and Mott-Schottky analysis method. Experimental results reveal that the detrimental effect of impurities containing sulfur at the reduced or intermediate oxidation level (S x ) on the passivity of Alloy 800 depends significantly on the solution pH. In neutral crevice (NC) chemistry containing chloride ions, the S x obstructs the healing process during repassivation, retards the dehydration reaction and also incorporates H, –OH and S into the passive film. However, the detrimental effect of S x is insignificant in a basic crevice (BC) solution due to a change in surface adsorption and surface charge. Impurities containing sulfur at the reduced or intermediate oxidation level would cause Alloy 800 to lose its passivity and become active in an acidic crevice (AC) chemistry. Experimental evidence also indicates that the solution pH alters the semiconductor type of the surface film —from n-type in NC solution to p-type in BC solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207