MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179295766

A Force for Good: How the American News Media Have Propelled Positive Change

2015· article· en· W2179295766 on OpenAlex
Katherine A. Bradshaw

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJournalismLeagueLesbianDemocracyMedia studiesNewspaperArgument (complex analysis)SociologyLawHistoryPolitical scienceGender studiesPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streitmatter, Rodger. A Force for Good: How the American News Media Have Propelled Positive Change. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015. 229 pp. $36.For most journalists, it's self-evident that their work makes a difference in our democracy. Rodger Streitmatter has selected examples of news coverage to show the ways in which journalism made a difference in the United States of America for more than one hundred years. He calls it propelling positive change. The sixteen examples demonstrating his argument include: coverage of Ellen DeGeneres coming out as a lesbian, Japanese-Americans seeking reparations for their internment during World War II, Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in major league baseball, and Bess Myerson becoming the first (and so far only) Jewish Miss America. Each chapter is an instance of journalism aimed at improving the lives of a segment of society.Streitmatter is careful to bracket his examples of outstanding journalism that helped along positive social change. In fact, he notes that some of the work could be seen as unethical because the journalists crossed the boundaries of standard practice. For example, some of the journalists covering Jackie Robinson, and their editors, intentionally diminished or ignored the ways in which Robinson was mistreated because he was black.The glowing coverage of Robinson began when he was signed by the Montreal Royals. The Baltimore Sun put its story about his acquisition by the Brooklyn Dodgers farm team on the front page in 1946 and so did the Chicago Tribune. When Robinson played his first, unremarkable game as a Brooklyn Dodger the next year The New York Times ran an editorial claiming he would have been playing sooner if he had been white, and praising the team's general manager for his courage. The news coverage during the season portrayed Robinson as humble, amiable, and cooperative. In the journalists' accounts, he was wholesome and had an exemplary private life. Any discouraging words were buried far down in the stories or not published at all. In fact, one team refused to take the field if Robinson was playing. Players from opposing teams stepped on Robinson, struck him with balls, and shouted racial epithets.Streitmatter credits the news coverage of DeGeneres with redefining the American lesbian. As in many chapters, a brief biography is included. He traces her public life from appearances on Johnny Carson's Tonight Show, to the television situation comedy in which the lead character came out as a lesbian, through her afternoon talk show, her marriage, and the extensive, positive news coverage along the way. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it