MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179295766

A Force for Good: How the American News Media Have Propelled Positive Change

2015· article· en· W2179295766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine A. Bradshaw

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJournalismLeagueLesbianDemocracyMedia studiesNewspaperArgument (complex analysis)SociologyLawHistoryPolitical scienceGender studiesPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streitmatter, Rodger. A Force for Good: How the American News Media Have Propelled Positive Change. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015. 229 pp. $36.For most journalists, it's self-evident that their work makes a difference in our democracy. Rodger Streitmatter has selected examples of news coverage to show the ways in which journalism made a difference in the United States of America for more than one hundred years. He calls it propelling positive change. The sixteen examples demonstrating his argument include: coverage of Ellen DeGeneres coming out as a lesbian, Japanese-Americans seeking reparations for their internment during World War II, Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in major league baseball, and Bess Myerson becoming the first (and so far only) Jewish Miss America. Each chapter is an instance of journalism aimed at improving the lives of a segment of society.Streitmatter is careful to bracket his examples of outstanding journalism that helped along positive social change. In fact, he notes that some of the work could be seen as unethical because the journalists crossed the boundaries of standard practice. For example, some of the journalists covering Jackie Robinson, and their editors, intentionally diminished or ignored the ways in which Robinson was mistreated because he was black.The glowing coverage of Robinson began when he was signed by the Montreal Royals. The Baltimore Sun put its story about his acquisition by the Brooklyn Dodgers farm team on the front page in 1946 and so did the Chicago Tribune. When Robinson played his first, unremarkable game as a Brooklyn Dodger the next year The New York Times ran an editorial claiming he would have been playing sooner if he had been white, and praising the team's general manager for his courage. The news coverage during the season portrayed Robinson as humble, amiable, and cooperative. In the journalists' accounts, he was wholesome and had an exemplary private life. Any discouraging words were buried far down in the stories or not published at all. In fact, one team refused to take the field if Robinson was playing. Players from opposing teams stepped on Robinson, struck him with balls, and shouted racial epithets.Streitmatter credits the news coverage of DeGeneres with redefining the American lesbian. As in many chapters, a brief biography is included. He traces her public life from appearances on Johnny Carson's Tonight Show, to the television situation comedy in which the lead character came out as a lesbian, through her afternoon talk show, her marriage, and the extensive, positive news coverage along the way. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0200.018
Scholarly communication0.0290.026
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207