MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179371796 · doi:10.1097/aci.0000000000000214

The immunological and genetic basis of immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome

2015· review· en· W2179371796 on OpenAlexafffund
Khalid Bin Dhuban, Ciriaco A. Piccirillo

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEnteropathyFOXP3Immune dysregulationImmunologyAutoimmunityMedicineImmune systemDiseaseRegulatory T cellRegulatorT cellGeneGeneticsBiologyIL-2 receptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article presents a comprehensive review of the immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy and X-linked (IPEX) syndrome, covering both the clinical and molecular aspects of the disease. (Figure is included in full-text article.) RECENT FINDINGS: The IPEX syndrome is a rare immunological disorder in humans caused by inheritable mutations in the FOXP3 gene, the master transcriptional regulator for the development and function of CD4 regulatory T (Treg) cells. Forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) Treg cells represent a unique T-cell lineage with inhibitory functions, and are responsible for immune homeostasis and tolerance to self and nonself antigens. Evidence shows that a Treg developmental deficiency or dysfunction underlies the severe, multiorgan, autoimmune disease of IPEX. SUMMARY: An in-depth structural and functional analysis of the molecular domains of FOXP3 is essential for our understanding of the observed clinical heterogeneity and prognosis in IPEX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207