Analisis Pemahaman Siswa Tentang Momen Inersia pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Biromaru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak- Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pemahaman siswa tentang momen inersia pada siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Biromaru. Responden dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 12 siswa kelas XI IPA Model pada SMA Negeri 1 Biromaru yang telah mengikuti materi Dinamika Rotasi. Data dikumpulkan melalui pemberian tes kepada 25 siswa dan wawancara dengan 12 responden untuk ditelusuri secara lebih mendalam kesalahan pemahaman siswa. Data penelitian dianalisis dengan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman siswa berada dalam kategori rendah menurut standar yang ditetapkan oleh departemen pendidikan dan kebudayaan. Pemahaman siswa mengenai konsep tentang momen inersia tergolong rendah. Untuk itu pengajar perlu mengajarkan dan membimbing siswa agar dapat memahami konsep dengan baik dan benar dengan cara membuat soal yang berhubungan dengan pemahaman konsep serta menggunakan tampilan animasi powerpoint, foto, gambar, alat peraga dan video. Kata Kunci: Pemahaman, momen inersia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".