Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A complete theory of contract law should answer two questions. The first is an analytic question about the nature of contractual obligation. What sorts of events give rise to a contractual obligation and what is the content of the obligations thus created? In particular, how are those events and obligations similar or dissimilar to the events and obligations that are the focus of tort law, unjust enrichment law, or equity? Where, in other words, should contract be situated on the map of private law? The second question is a normative or justificatory question: how, if at all, can contract law be justified? What is the moral basis, if any, for enforcing contractual obligations? Do rights, utility, or something else-or nothing else-underpin contract law? The analytic and normative questions are related. The justification for contractual obligation turns in part on what sort of a thing a contractual obligation is. And-though the point is more complex and controversial-our understanding of the nature of contractual obligations is determined in part by our views on what sorts of obligations are, or at least might conceivably be, legitimately enforced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it