Developing a Postbasic Gerontology Program for International Learners: Considerations for the Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A private university in Chile was seeking opportunities to acquire expertise in developing distance education programs using new media technology, especially in health-related fields. An initiative was undertaken to develop a distance postbasic gerontology program for technical nurses in Chile by partnering with a Canadian school of nursing. METHOD: The instructional design process was used as a systematic approach throughout the development of the program. Attention to cultural considerations was emphasized throughout each phase of the process. RESULTS: The developed program consists of 13 self-paced print modules with web-based components and is primarily asynchronous with scheduled milestones. A 6-week preceptored clinical experience follows completion of the theory portion to support learner mastery of program outcomes. CONCLUSION: Developing international nursing education programs is an enriching experience that presents unique challenges and issues. These challenges can be overcome by using a creative, systematic approach to program development that reflects cultural considerations. Developing flexible working relationships that respect the cultural differences of international team members facilitates international initiatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".