MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179667063 · doi:10.1175/jtech1882.1

Satellite Measurement of Stratospheric Winds and Ozone Using Doppler Michelson Interferometry. Part II: Retrieval Method and Expected Performance

2006· article· en· W2179667063 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Rochon, Peyman Rahnama, I. C. McDade

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingAtmospheric soundingInterferometryEnvironmental scienceDoppler effectStratosphereMeteorologyCovarianceMichelson interferometerInversion (geology)SatelliteOptimal estimationPhysicsGeologyOpticsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is about the retrieval of horizontal wind and ozone number density from measurement simulations for the Stratospheric Wind Interferometer for Transport Studies (SWIFT). This instrument relies on the concept of imaging Doppler Michelson interferometry applied to thermal infrared emission originating from the stratosphere. The instrument and measurement simulations are described in detail in the first of this series of two papers. In this second paper, a summary of the measurement simulations and a data retrieval method suited to these measurements are first presented. The inversion method consists of the maximum a posteriori solution approach with added differential regularization and, when required, iterations performed with the Gauss–Newton method. Inversion characterization and an error analysis have been performed. Retrieval noise estimates have been obtained both from derived covariance matrices and sample inversions. Retrieval noise levels for wind and ozone number density of ∼1–3 m s−1 and <1% have been obtained over the altitude range of 20–45 km with Backus–Gilbert resolving lengths of ∼1.5 km. Retrieval noise levels over the extended altitude range of 15–55 km are less than 10 m s−1 and 2%. The sensitivity to other error sources has been examined through a few sample realizations. The contributions from these other errors can be as important as or more so than retrieval noise. An error budget identifying contributing wind and ozone error levels to total errors of 5 m s−1 and 5% for altitudes of 20–45 km has been prepared relying on the retrieval errors and knowledge of the instrument design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologySame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207