MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179668637 · doi:10.1115/detc2005-84115

The R-Refinement Finite Element Analysis of Flexible Four-Bar Linkage

2005· article· en· W2179668637 on OpenAlexaff
Yong-Lin Kuo, William L. Cleghorn, Kamran Behdinan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinkage (software)Finite element methodComputationDiscretizationFour-bar linkageBar (unit)Set (abstract data type)AlgorithmConstant (computer programming)Computer scienceMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The r-refinement of the finite element method locates the positions of nodes to increase accuracy based on a mesh with a given number of elements and a given set of nodal variables. To compare with the conventional refinements by increasing the number of nodal variables, the r-refinement does not increases computations but increase the accuracy of approximated solutions. This paper presents the application of the r-refinement on a flexible four-bar linkage, and provides the study of the effect of the r-refinement on the constant/periodical rotating speed and the discretization of the input link. The results are compared with those by increasing the number of elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207