La movilidad estudiantil dentro de la estrategia de internacionalización de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Montreal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Students are the foundation and the raison d'etre of the universities. Provide an education with high standards of quality involves offering programs that allow students to adapt and respond adequately to the new challenges faced by an increasingly globalized society. The internationalization of education is no longer an option for Universities and has become a real imperative. Within these processes, student mobility has been identified as a factor that objectively represents the dynamism of internationalization policies implemented in an institution. The international leadership adopted by the School of Law at the University of Montreal, has allowed a large percentage of their student population being benefited from international training. In this regard, the summer schools organized in China in collaboration with the CUPL as in Costa Rica with the School of Law at the University of Costa Rica, are successful models that have contributed not only to an openness to other cultures and languages, but also to other approaches to the study of law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it