MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179864287 · doi:10.1603/0022-0493-99.4.1310

Detection of <I>Contarinia nasturtii</I> (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in New York, a New Pest of Cruciferous Plants in the United States

2006· article· en· W2179864287 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Julie R. Kikkert, Christine A. Hoepting, Qingjun Wu, Ping Wang, Robert Baur, Anthony M. Shelton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Economic Entomology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pheromone Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsCecidomyiidaeBiologyMidgeInfestationPEST analysisAgronomyBotanyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The midge Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) was first confirmed in North America in Ontario, Canada, in 2000. The insect is now distributed throughout many counties in the provinces of Ontario and Québec. Nearly 1,200 farms in the northeastern United States that grow cruciferous vegetables are at risk for C. nasturtii infestation if this insect were to spread to that region. Over a period of 3 yr (2002-2004), approximately 3,000 ha of crops on 94 farms in western New York State was scouted for C. nasturtii, but none were found. In 2004, 42 experimental pheromone traps were placed in fields of cruciferous vegetables in eight counties. C. nasturtii males were captured at low levels (1-50 per trap / 8 wk) on four farms in Niagara County, but not at any other site. C. nasturtii larvae were found in plant tissue at one of the four farms. Insect specimens were identified by morphological methods, molecular methods, or both. This is the first confirmation of C. nasturtii in the United States, which we believe was made possible by the combined use of pheromone traps, morphological characters of trapped adults, and molecular methods. The early detection in New York presents an opportunity to implement measures to limit the spread and establishment of C. nasturtii across the state and into other regions of the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Economic EntomologySame topicInsect Pheromone Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207