MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179938753 · doi:10.5589/q12-011

Effect of GOx swirl-injector number in a cold-wall swirl-driven combustion chamber

2012· article· en· W2179938753 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachid Zerrouki, Abdelkrim Liazid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian aeronautics and space journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInjectorCombustionCombustion chamberMaterials scienceMechanicsMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a 3-D numerical study of the innovative cold-wall bidirectional vortex combustion chamber. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of the oxygen gas (GOx) swirl injector number on combustion and wall protection. Firstly, a numerical simulation carried out previously on the same combustion chamber equipped with four GOx swirl injectors was achieved. Then the number of GOx swirl injectors was changed to two and eight, the global oxygen mass flow rate was considered, and its influence was analyzed. Results showed that the GOx swirl injector number of eight improves the combustion process which leads to an increase in the engine-specific impulse. Also, the wall temperature reduction permits more flexibility in material selection that can ensure durability and reduced weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian aeronautics and space journalSame topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207