On Non-Poissonian Voronoi Tessellations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The Voronoi tessellation is the partition of space for a given seeds pattern and the result of the partition depends completely on the type of given pattern ”random”, Poisson-Voronoi tessellations (PVT), or ”non-random”, Non Poisson-Voronoi tessellations. In this note we shall consider properties of Voronoi tessellations with centers gener-ated by Sobol quasi random sequences which produce a more ordered disposition of the centers with respect to the PVT case. A probability density function for volumes of these Sobol Voronoi tessellations (SVT) will be proposed and compared with results of numerical simulations. An application will be presented concerning the local struc-ture of gas (CO<sub>2</sub>) in the liquid-gas coexistence phase. Furthermore a probability distribution will be computed for the length of chords resulting from the intersections of random lines with a three-dimensional SVT. The agreement of the analytical formula with the results from a computer simulation will be also investigated. Finally a new type of Voronoi tessellation based on adjustable positions of seeds has been introduced which generalizes both PVT and SVT cases.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".