Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Reflections on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the midst of a financial crisis are likely to have several starting and turning points. The current instabilities of the financial markets dramatically put into perspective the almost religious wars fought over the last twenty years between shareholder value proponents and stakeholder capitalism defenders, carried out as a dispute over global convergence or divergence of corporate governance standards. The expansion of global corporate finance, particularly since the collapse of communism, dramatically changed our perspective on the business corporation, from industrial, embedded capitalism to financial capitalism. This change in perspective tells a story about the way in which we attribute different categories of responsibilities to the business corporation. While we are seemingly well acquainted with the ‘classical’ segments of that story, its continuation is anything but clear. The history of corporate social responsibility as an ideal, concept, dream, ideology or illusion is as intertwined in the larger political economy of capitalist developmentas it has a particular idiosyncratic history of its own. The following observations aim at illustrating this history with reference to three larger paradigms regarding the theory of the business corporation – and associated theories of corporate (social) responsibilities. This chapter proposes to reflect on the history and on the prospects of CSR through the study of its evolution by focusing on three paradigms: the organizational–industrial paradigm of the corporation, which evolved over the first seventy-five years of the twentieth century, views the corporation as an object for competing concepts of market intervention, for both conflicts over the appropriate role of business enterprises and for the scope of legal regulation of business in the context of Keynesian economics and welfare statism. Within the first paradigm, the relevance of contested ‘social responsibilities’ of the business corporation can only be understood when seen against the larger background of a radically unfolding market economy, a critique of formal law and a deep-reaching deconstruction of political, legal and economic power. For corporate law, this phase is marked by heated normative debates over the social status of business corporations, which centred around ideological disputes over the ‘public’ or ‘private’ nature of the corporation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".