Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reflections on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the midst of a financial crisis are likely to have several starting and turning points. The current instabilities of the financial markets dramatically put into perspective the almost religious wars fought over the last twenty years between shareholder value proponents and stakeholder capitalism defenders, carried out as a dispute over global convergence or divergence of corporate governance standards. The expansion of global corporate finance, particularly since the collapse of communism, dramatically changed our perspective on the business corporation, from industrial, embedded capitalism to financial capitalism. This change in perspective tells a story about the way in which we attribute different categories of responsibilities to the business corporation. While we are seemingly well acquainted with the 'classical' segments of that story, its continuation is anything but clear. The history of corporate social responsibility as an ideal, concept, dream, ideology or illusion is as intertwined in the larger political economy of capitalist developmentas it has a particular idiosyncratic history of its own. The following observations aim at illustrating this history with reference to three larger paradigms regarding the theory of the business corporation – and associated theories of corporate (social) responsibilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".